Jump Ahead!
Addiction Severity Index (ASI)
Family Burden Interview Schedule/Short
Form (FBIS/SF)
SF-12
Treatment Services Review (TSR)
Washington Circle Adult
Substance Abuse Performance Measures
Introduction
Over the past 10 years, payers have increasingly
demanded more accountability and evidence of
positive clinical outcomes. Various stakeholders—including
insurance companies, the Federal Government (Medicaid
and Medicare), and businesses in the public and
private sectors—all
want to know that their employees and beneficiaries
are getting better
and that functional status has improved because
of treatment and the outlay of benefit dollars.
In addition, they want more information about
the effects of treatment (e.g., improvements
in general health status, improvements in work
performance) on their employees beyond utilization,
costs, and satisfaction with services. Performance
measurement plays a critical role in meeting
the accountability demands of various stakeholders.
A
system of performance measurement must be a component
of an organization's overall
quality strategy. The strategy must conform to
healthcare quality, defined as "the degree
to which health services for individuals and
populations increase the likelihood of desired
healthcare outcomes and are consistent with
current professional knowledge" (Committee
to Design a Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance
in Medicare, 1990, p. 4).
In addition, the performance measurement system
should conform to an accepted healthcare quality
framework. The Institute of Medicine (IOM),
in its work on developing a framework for
a national
report card (CNQRHCD, 2001), developed four
components of healthcare quality: safety,
effectiveness,
patient-centeredness, and timeliness (p. 7).
These are taken from the six specific aims
for healthcare improvement proposed by the
IOM Committee
on Quality of Health Care in America (CQHCA,
2001). (See Figure 1.)
A performance measurement system is defined
as "an entity consisting of an automated
database that
facilitates performance improvement in healthcare organizations through the dissemination
and collection of process and/or outcome
measures of performance. Measurement systems
must be
able
to generate internal comparisons of organization
performance over time and external comparisons
of performance among participating organizations
at a comparable time" (JCAHO, 1998).
Performance
measurement systems have been developed and
implemented in managed care organizations
and clinical programs (large and small group
practices, mental health clinics, staff model
health maintenance organizations) and by purchasers
themselves. Treatment staff members can use
performance results to monitor and improve outcomes,
processes
of care, quality of care, accountability, satisfaction
and perception, and values determination.
For providers and program administrators, performance
measurement systems will provide the opportunity
to benchmark with local, state, and national norms
and best practices and to conduct comparative
analyses within and among clinics. Providers will
be able to assess the effects of treatment interventions
on health-related quality of life. Data will be
analyzed to inform clinical care; clinic-level
data could inform the development and refinement
of the overall treatment program. Furthermore,
local, state, and national data could serve as
a resource for clinics across the country and
for health services researchers interested in
methadone treatment.
Click here for a list of performance measurement
sets
References
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
(CQHCA), Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing
the quality chasm: A new health system for the
21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
Committee on the National Quality Report on Health
Care Delivery (CNQRHCD), Board on Health Care
Services. (2001). Envisioning the national
health care quality report. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
Committee to Design a Strategy for Quality Review
and Assurance in Medicare, Institute of Medicine.
(1990). Medicare: A strategy for quality
assurance, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations (JCAHO). (1998). Glossary of
terms for performance measurement systems.
Retrieved December 2, 2005, from www.jcaho.org/pms/reference+materials/glossary.htm
|